|
|
| Principal North American trade corridors. Click to enlarge. |
Cross-border cooperation to improve environmental performance of the North American freight system is urgently needed not just to enhance environmental sustainability, but to safeguard regional economic competitiveness, according to a new report from the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC).
The report, Destination Sustainability: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Freight Transportation in North America, looks at the continental freight transportation network, a key component of the transportation sector, which is the second-largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in North America, after electricity generation. The report, which focuses on road and rail transport, finds that while emissions from light-duty vehicles are expected to drop by 12% by 2030, freight truck emissions are projected to increase by 20%.
The report also considers the efficiency (and inefficiencies) in the current system, as well as considering the aggressive investments that other trade blocs are making in new infrastructure and lower-carbon transportation—investments that may be outpacing efforts in North America.
The Secretariat of the CEC—a trinational commission established as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)—examines environmental matters arising as part of continental trade and makes occasional recommendations to the governments of Canada, Mexico and the United States through the CEC Council of cabinet-level (or equivalent) environmental authorities.
This report is something of a roadmap to both sustainability and prosperity. It turns out that, in the freight transportation sector, the best policies and investments for reducing freight-related greenhouse gas emissions are also some of the most effective measures for driving improvements to efficiency and competitiveness.
—CEC Advisory Group Chair Bruce Agnew
Reducing the environmental impact of freight transportation in the face of increasing trade and economic growth in North America requires much more than continued progress on fuel economy and transport technology. This report calls on our three governments to adopt a vision of an integrated, intelligent freight transportation system for North America. Without such a vision, and the transformational investments that go with it, GHG emissions from freight transportation will continue to increase and the NAFTA countries will risk losing their competitive edge. But, the report identifies clear opportunities, especially in light of infrastructure-related stimulus investment, to get this right.
—CEC Executive Director Evan Lloyd
Prepared under the guidance of an Advisory Group including stakeholders from industry, academia, the environmental sector and government, Destination Sustainability focuses on North-South (and equally, South-North) freight transportation between Canada, Mexico and the United States. The principal environmental goal examined was to find ways to reduce CO2
emissions, which account for 95% or more of all freight transportation–related
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
It is estimated that the North American economy will grow by 70–130%
between the years 2005 and 2030. Throughout this period, the transportation
sector is expected to maintain its position as a dominant end-user of energy. To
avoid a corresponding increase in freight-related GHG emissions, we will need not
only continued progress in developing fuel economy, technologies, and alternative
fuels, but also the vision and will to create an integrated, intelligent, freight
transportation system in North America. Ensuring that the freight system is
environmentally sustainable in the future also requires implementing a broad set
of cooperative policies and actions to optimize demand, invest in infrastructure,
set a price for carbon, ensure an optimal modal mix (e.g., truck/rail/marine), and
manage our borders in the most secure and efficient manner possible.—“Destination Sustainability”
The report identifies seven challenges to achieving more–environmentally
sustainable freight transportation in North America:
- Lack of internalization of external
costs of freight transportation - Inadequate coordination
among North American
transportation agencies - Lack of integrated land-use and
freight transportation planning - Extensive delays in truck freight
movement across borders - Time needed for turnover of
inefficient “legacy” truck fleet - Inadequate funding of
transportation infrastructure - Lack of essential
transportation data
The study also identifies eleven action areas in which progress at
a North American scale is required. Only two of these are directly related to fuel content and transportation technologies:
- Pricing carbon
- Reducing border delays and
enhancing security - Integrating transportation and
land-use planning - Shifting to more-efficient
transportation modes - Shifting to lower-carbon fuels
- Increasing the efficiency of
transportation technologies - Funding transportation
infrastructure and pricing its use - Greening supply chains and
implementing best practices - Acquiring data and developing
performance metrics - Reducing demand for inefficient
freight transportation - Improving freight transportation
governance and
stakeholder networking
The report also makes six recommendations to help Canada, Mexico, and the United States to foster a
more efficient, competitive, secure, and environmentally sustainable
freight transportation system in
North America:
-
Coordination and Networking. The NAFTA partners should consider forming a ministerial-level North American Transportation Forum that will work in cooperation with an industry, expert and stakeholder group to foster an integrated, intelligent freight transportation system, a more seamless and efficient set of linkages that bring the three countries—functionally if not literally—closer together.
-
Carbon Pricing and System Efficiency Strategies. Canada, Mexico and the United States should consider putting a price on carbon to give everyone a clear signal that they should be investing in efficiency and in low-carbon fuel alternatives.
-
Investments to Improve the Efficiency of the Freight Transportation System. The three countries should re-invest in the transportation system itself – in road, rail and waterway infrastructure that is, in many places, congested and deteriorating. The countries should provide meaningful incentives for advanced fuel-saving technologies and the adoption of intelligent transportation systems.
-
Supply Chain Management. Transportation agencies, and businesses operating nationally and across international borders, could reduce costs and GHG emissions by managing the transportation system more efficiently. For example, emissions go down (and profits up) if fewer long-haul trucks return empty or travel over routes that are better served by more carbon-efficient rail.
-
Training Eco-drivers. Each jurisdiction can improve the training and equipping of drivers to optimize their environmental and economic performance by driving in ways that conserve energy.
-
Gathering and Sharing Data. Transportation, environmental and statistical agencies in all three countries should work through the North American Transportation Statistics Interchange (NATS-Interchange) to enhance the quality and comparability of freight data, including the measurement of environmental impacts, to better manage freight transportation as a continent-wide system.
The Commission for Environmental Cooperation was established by the United States, Canada and Mexico in 1994 as part of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, a side agreement to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The CEC’s mission is to facilitate collaboration among the parties and the public to ensure that North American free trade is conducted in a way that protects and preserves the environment for future generations.
CEC Advisory Group Chair Bruce Agnew is the executive director of the Cascadia Trade Corridor, which promotes a balanced, seamless, and expanded transportation system between Washington, Oregon and British Columbia through public-private partnerships and innovative financing.
Resources