Truckers around the country and in the nation’s capital gathered to protest the upcoming electronic logging device mandate, which goes into effect this December.
Some are participating in the ELD or Me protest in the nation’s capital, while others took to the streets in Fresno, California, as part of Operation Black and Blue, to protest the implementation of electronic logging devices which have proved controversial among small trucking companies and owner-operators.
Some truck drivers protested in front of the Fresno City Hall to voice concerns over the ELD’s effect on their daily work habits, telling local media that the inflexible devices would be forcing them to take breaks when they don’t need to, or worse, when they need more time. For independent drivers who need to be on the road as much as possible, and for whom quick turnarounds are key, this issue is about maintaining their livelihood.
With paper logs, drivers were able to add in the extra time they needed to find a suitable parking spot or to account for unavoidable delays at loading docks. To many of the drivers who participated in the protest, ELDs with their cold precision and complete adherence to regulations down to the second can seem out of touch with the human realities on the road.
Operation Black and Blue states on the group’s Facebook page, “Operation Black and Blue was created expressly for the support and coordination of efforts by truck drivers to help put a stop to the FMCSA, DOT, and ATA. We are against government overreach and over-regulation.”
The group has more than 3,500 followers.
Many of the protesting truckers, the Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association and a coalition of other transportation associations, have put their support behind a bill that, if passed, would halt the mandate’s implementation for two years.
This close to the implementation date, however, it may be unlikely that Congress will rescind or delay the ELD rule. Since July, a lone lawmaker, Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX), has twice introduced legislation aimed at either delaying implementation of the ELD rule or slowing its rollout by preventing funding of the mandate. One of these measures failed to pass and the other has so far not been acted on by a committee.
The H.R. 3282, the ELD Extension Act of 2017, which the congressman introduced in July, would have delayed making the rule effective for two years. So far, it has attracted 55 co-sponsors and has been referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee— which has yet to take it up.
In early September, Babin crafted an anti-ELD amendment that was offered up for attachment to some unrelated legislation (H.R. 3354, the Make America Secure and Prosperous Appropriations Act of 2018). It was intended to delay the mandate for almost a year by preventing funding of it. On Sept. 6, that rider was voted down on the House floor.
What marked both of these legislative work-arounds as little more than Hail Mary Passes is the reality that most notable trucking stakeholder groups, with the exception of OOIDA, remain in favor of implementing the ELD rule with no further delay.
What’s more, no companion legislation to delay or defund the ELD mandate has yet to be introduced – nor is it at all likely to be introduced – in the Senate. Even if one is passed, an anti-ELD House bill alone is ultimately meaningless.
In fact, a lot of lobbying firepower remains aimed at keeping the rule as it is and at keeping its initial effective date what it is: Dec. 18 — now just 10 weeks away
The last, best hope to stave off the mandate fizzled back on June 12 when the U.S. Supreme Court denied the OOIDA’s petition that it rule on whether the regulation violates the Fourth Amendment right to privacy of truck drivers. So, the avenue for judicial relief has been closed off and Capitol Hill won’t act in time to halt or slow the rule this year, if not ever.
Follow @HDTrucking on Twitter